|LETTER TO EDITOR
|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 36-37
Comments on: A rare entity of tubercular mastitis with chest wall extension in a male
Motilal Bunkar1, Rajendra Takhar1, Vinod Jangid1, Anil Saxena1, Yogesh Gupta2
1 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Government Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India
2 Sudha Hospital and Research Centre, Kota, Rajasthan, India
|Date of Web Publication||23-Dec-2015|
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Qtr No 1/4, Government Medical College Campus, Kota - 324 010, Rajasthan
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Bunkar M, Takhar R, Jangid V, Saxena A, Gupta Y. Comments on: A rare entity of tubercular mastitis with chest wall extension in a male. J Assoc Chest Physicians 2016;4:36-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Bunkar M, Takhar R, Jangid V, Saxena A, Gupta Y. Comments on: A rare entity of tubercular mastitis with chest wall extension in a male. J Assoc Chest Physicians [serial online] 2016 [cited 2021 Dec 7];4:36-7. Available from: https://www.jacpjournal.org/text.asp?2016/4/1/36/168620
We read with great interest the nicely written article “A rare entity of tubercular mastitis with chest wall extension in a male” by Prakash et al. published in the esteemed journal, The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians. At the outset, we would like to go into raptures over the authors for sharing their experience with others and also for enlightening us with this topic of huge clinical importance in day-to-day practice. It is an interesting case of tubercular mastitis, an important differential diagnosis of breast carcinoma.
The authors have presented their case in a simple, fluent, painstaking and graceful way, yet we have some comments to offer for the authors:
- The authors have mentioned that the patient visited a surgeon who did a lumpectomy considering it to be a neoplastic condition before attending to them. However, did not divulge the biopsy or histopathological examination of lumpectomy specimen further not explained as what treatment he got from the surgeon. Demonstration of characteristic histopathological features on biopsy specimen of the breast lump and/or culture positivity for mycobacterium are essential requisites to confirm the diagnosis of breast tuberculosis 
- In the case history, the authors mentioned that incisional biopsy from chest wall swelling showed granulomatous inflammation suggestive of tubercular mastitis. As we know, there are numerous granulomatous conditions, including sarcoidosis, fungal infections, Wegener granulomatosis, and granulomatous reactions to altered fatty material, which may show the tuberculoid type of tissue reaction histologically and microscopically indistinguishable from tuberculosis. The authors did not explain as what specific histopathological feature extricate it from other granulomatous conditions
- There are many repetitions of sentences and even a complete paragraph, has been repeated in introduction and discussion, starting from “In Western countries, the reported incidence is <1% of breast lesions examined histologically. However, it accounts for 3% of surgically treatable breast conditions in India. It comprises about 3% of breast diseases and was 5 times less common than carcinoma of the breast. Though much more common in females, 4% of patients are males.” It is recommended that a good article should not have repetitions of previous ones 
- Finally, there is gross plagiarism in this article, including introduction and discussion. As “plagiarism is the stealing of another person's ideas, methods, results, or words without giving proper attribution.” Majority of the material plagiarized from a review article by Tewari and Shukla  and leave an impression that the author first copy-pasted the complete published article in the document. Then, minor modifications were made to fill the important findings.
It is our unpretentious request not to blame the authors, but to discuss common misconceptions during writing an article. We also want to emphasize how to write a good article by introducing and explaining the importance of plagiarism.
It would be prodigious if the authors respond in the larger interest of the readers of this esteemed journal.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Prakash V, Kumar V, Mishra A, Verma AK, Joshi A, Kant S. A rare entity of tubercular mastitis with chest wall extension in a male. J Assoc Chest Physicians 2015;3:57-9.
Kakkar S, Kapila K, Singh MK, Verma K. Tuberculosis of the breast. A cytomorphologic study. Acta Cytol 2000;44:292-6.
Symmers WS, editor. The breasts. In: Systemic Pathology. 2nd
ed., Vol. 4. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1978. p. 1759-61.
Tewari M, Shukla HS. Breast tuberculosis: Diagnosis, clinical features and management. Indian J Med Res 2005;122:103-10.
Sharma BB, Singh V. Ethics in writing: Learning to stay away from plagiarism and scientific misconduct. Lung India 2011;28:148-50.